bloglovinBloglovin iconCombined ShapeCreated with Sketch. Fill 1Created with Sketch. Fill 1Created with Sketch. Fill 1Created with Sketch. Fill 1Created with Sketch. Fill 1Created with Sketch. rssRSS iconsoundcloudSoundCloud iconFill 1Created with Sketch. Fill 1Created with Sketch. Fill 1Created with Sketch. Fill 1Created with Sketch. close searchCreated with Lunacy

3 Lies Everyone Believes About Avoiding Copyright Infringement

Woman researching avoiding copyright infringement

Today I’m talking about the three big lies that you might have heard about avoiding copyright infringement.

You might think you’re not committing copyright infringement, but… you could be wrong. (Did you get that reference?)

In this video, you’re going to learn what every online brand needs to know about avoiding copyright infringement on the internet.

Lie number one: if I’m not charging anything, or making money from it, then it’s not copyright infringement. Right?

Wrong.

Copyright infringement is what’s called “strict liability.” That’s lawyer speak for: just doing the act is enough.

There doesn’t have to be any kind of intent to commit copyright infringement. You don’t have to make money from it. Just the act of copying is copyright infringement. There’s no requirement that you make money in order for it to be considered copyright infringement.

(Sorry.)

Number two: if I add a disclaimer, or tag the original creator, then I can’t get in trouble.

Wrong. So wrong.

(Apparently, I’m into quoting Mean Girls today.)

You’ve seen “I claim no rights to this music,” or “I claim no rights to whatever” in people’s posts, right? But, like I just said, you’ve copied it. That’s it. That’s the infringement. Just copying or using someone else’s material without permission is infringement.

And!

I’ve heard of several photographers who actually track infringement on social media, by the people that tagged them.

Using someone else’s photo without their permission, unless you properly licensed it somehow, is copyright infringement. Credit, or no credit.

Numero 3: If I found a photo on Google image search or on Pinterest, then it’s royalty-free or public domain, and I can use it, and it’s not copyright infringement.

No, no, no, no, no.

I had a client once that used a photo that he found on Google image search in a blog post. He got a big fat cease and desist letter from a firm that does volume copyright infringement work. That just means that they sent thousands of cease and desist letters — that is their bread and butter.

The photographers that they represent all register their photos with the Copyright Office. (Which is very, very smart.)

Then, they pay these firms to crack down on unauthorized uses. So this cease and desist letter asked for multiple thousands. Based on the Copyright Act, if someone infringes your work, and you’ve registered with the Copyright Office, you get from $750 to $30,000 in damages. He didn’t end up having to pay 30,000, but he had to pay something.

Hear me on this.

Google Image Search catalogs images from everywhere. They are not necessarily royalty-free. They are not necessarily public domain. Don’t look on Google image search for free images. Nope, nope, nope.

So the secret to avoiding copyright infringement online?

Use things that only you’ve created, or if you’re using something that you didn’t create, or posting something that you didn’t create, make sure you have permission.

That’s it.

So I hope that helps you to better understand the three lies everyone believes about avoiding copyright infringement on the internet. And I’ll see you next time.

CONTACT COPYCATS YOURSELF WITH CONFIDENCE

A Content Creator’s Guide to Dealing with Copycats

Itching to contact that copycat, but not ready to go full lawyer-cease-and-desist, yet?

In this free resource, you’ll get:

  • A little checklist to run through before you contact someone yourself;
  • An idea of things that you can say; and
  • What NOT to say.

Click here for access.

Inspired Versus Infringing: A Look at “Idea Law”

woman looking at artwork wondering where the line is between inspiration versus infringement

There’s always that question about the fine line between being inspired by something and infringing. This post gives you a quick reminder on what copyright infringement is and a brief little explanation on what’s protectable under copyright law and what’s not. By the end, you’ll have a good understanding of “idea law” and how that relates to that line between inspired versus infringing.

A quick reminder on what copyright is

So first you’ve heard me talk about how copyright is a bundle of rights, right? It’s your… copyright owner has the exclusive right to copy, sell, display, publish, all of these things, and each one of those things is like a twig in the bundle of rights of copyright. 

A quick reminder on what copyright infringement is

Infringement is taking one of those things and doing it without the permission of the copyright owner. Notice I did not say “…and make money” or “…and make a profit.” It is simply doing one of those things that constitutes copyright infringement.

What’s NOT protectable under copyright law? Ideas.

These ideas are great and valuable… once you flesh them out. Once you actually create these things and the details around them, they cross the line from idea into IP. But in their form as an idea, they’re not quite protectable yet.

It helps to think about more traditional creative works when trying to explain this concept. Here are a few examples.

The TV show example

Think about a TV show. I have an idea for a TV show about doctors, and we’ll focus on the drama between the doctors at the hospital and we’ll throw in some crazy injuries or illnesses in the patients and weave that into the story. What TV show am I talking about? Who the heck knows! There are a hundred TV shows about doctors, right? Grey’s Anatomy, ER, there are more that I probably don’t even know about. So that pure idea is not original, it’s not unique.

Now what is protectable? Well in those shows that I mentioned: the script, the actual audio-visual works, the trademark… Those things that have been fleshed out and expanded upon make those TV shows unique.

The work-of-art example

Another way to think about it is an idea for a painting. So, if you tell two artists to paint a picture of a girl eating an ice cream cone those artists could create two completely different looking pieces, right? Because two artist can have the same general idea and then express it very differently. That’s probably the perfect example of how an idea is an idea alone, but the expression of the idea – the resulting artwork — is what’s protectable.

The Amy Porterfield vs. Jenna Kutcher example

Did you know that both Amy Porterfield and Jenna Kutcher have online courses on building your email list? Yup. Same general idea, different (protectable) execution. What’s the general idea? A digital course on building your email list. What’s the protectable, unique expression? The branding. The different worksheets. Definitely different video content. They each have their own take and own unique spin on the subject.

Determining when something is inspired by versus infringing

When you find that you’re inspired by someone else’s work, ask yourself: is it the general idea that you’re wanting to make your own, or would you be infringing that person’s unique expression of that idea?

Remember that unique original expression, not the idea itself, is what’s protectable under US copyright law. 


Got an online business? Do you like free info? Click below to learn four things you can do right now to protect your business online.